When someone or something isn't worth your time, but you still have it or them.
You are too busy with your other problems to worry about me, I guess I'm just your side problem.
Means that’s a personal problem when someone has to do it alone.
“ Someone says it smart to you, then you say that’s a personal problem “
A situation that arises during software development in which one developers build works perfectly (we call this the David build) whilst all other builds are completely fucked.
Dev 1: "Oh man, why isn't this building!!"
Dev 2: "What do you mean? It's building fine for me and we are running the same version.. ?"
Dev 1: "Why must you constantly create the David Problem..."
When someone is weird or indicted to something that can be real or fake.
You have problems with smoking you do it so much.
Is how it's supposed existence is demonstrated, right? They usually use this binary prompt-response scenario. Like "Think of a city. Now did you pick the the specific city or was it random?" And I think that's the wrong way to conceptualize it.
Hym "So, my problem with determinism (at least in this example of determinism) is that although I don't choose the specific city, I still activate the 'mode' that searches for city and I can choose not to do it and prevent a city from coming to mind OR I can misfire. It's like a hat with with slips of paper in it and, on the slips of paper, are the names of cities. Now, you can prompt me to think of 'city.' I can choose to reach into the hat. And only then do I get a random city. But what I DON'T get is 'Nissan' or 'helicopter' or 'banana' or 'dog.' I activate the mode that searches for city and I reach into the hat. See, as I have it conceptualized, thought exists in this nebulous, un-articulated format. So, to get language I need to activate some kind of process. And prompt response ISN'T THE SAME as what I'm doing when I'm monologing. I'm running that nebulous, un-articulated thought-matter through a lexicon that corresponds with my native language. But I am that which activates modes. I can can turn it on or off like a switch. It can also misfire while I'm not paying attention. So, yeah... I think it's a failure to properly conceptualize and a failure to compartmentalize."
When the father that a woman had was physically present but emotionally not available. Similar context to "daddy issues" where the father is physically absent, etc.
She didn't exactly have 'daddy issues', it was more like father problems.
If you simp for Dabi, you have daddy issues, but if you simp for Nanami, then you have father problems.
Sounds like a re-brand of Reagan's "welfare queens" but...
Hym "How is fucking YouTube charlatans using Nietzsche's work and the bible to proselytize for a religion (the truth of which) they do not believe while everyone else works and the creator of A.I. doesn't get credited or paid NOT the free rider problem in action? How is doing nothing more than reacting to other people's lives and then attaching merch to your reaction NOT the free rider problem?"
Dr. JeepJorp "It's the psychopaths! The evil deranged psychopaths that I AM NOT ONE OF (But I can't take the test because I'll cheat on the test)! They don't want me to breed! They won't to the incest cult!"
Iam "Hey! Dr. JeepJorp! Want some cinnamon toast crunch? Cus... I got some Cinnamon Toast Crunch here... I ran out of plastic spoons so... You gotta use a fork but- Hey, I got like half a giant-size box man... Get you some..."
Dr. Jeepjorp "The psychopaths want short term gratification! It's fine when Elon the retard literally engages in short term gratification with Johnny Depp's wife and literally doesn't do any of the things I say but the psychopaths!?"
Iam "Yeah man, totally. You sure you don't want any- Oh... Hey, I'm running out of milk..."
Dr. JeepJorp "Psychopaths ALWAYS run out of milk! Their machiavellianism makes it impossible for them to keep enough Mike for their guests!"