Random
Source Code
Random
Refers to the age-old "cranky conundrum" issue about when children want to go to bed as opposed to when adults wish to do so. Many youngsters detest bedtime and want to delay it as long as possible, whereas grownups often can't wait to "hit da hay", and are also always looking to "catch a few extra winks" whenever possible.
Da whole bedtime-vs.-age debacle equally applies to getting up in the morning, as well --- many kids are totally "rarin' to go" at da crack of dawn, whereas their exhausted parents would happily "sleep till noon" if they had da choice.
Where you get bum fucked by an Iden, Vader and Palpi all at the same time
Person 1: Wanna play Heroes Vs Villains
Person 2: Weirdo
Megamind Vs The Doom Syndacite, the worst movie in existence
*Its February 1st 2024*
Person: You know Megamind?
Person 2: yeah, what a good movie man
Person: well, they released a trailer for a sequel and a SHOW. Its called "Megamind Vs The Doom Syndicate" and the show is called "Megamind Rules!"
Person 2: Wow! I wonder how a sequel would work for Megamind
Person: I don't know, lets watch it.
*after watching it*
Person 2: What...did....they...do...to....MEGAMIND!
*people look at Person 2 while walking away*
Person 2: humanity is doomed.
Alex vs. Aleks is a philosophical question that asks if Alex has any correlation with the hit math website, ALEKS. This started during a game of jackbox rap battles in which dev said the verse “go home to alex and go do your aleks!”. this sparked an intense debate that ended with fire and fury, and has been a running gag in various media ever since. There has also been the possible explanation, called the “Lewis Paradox”, which theorizes that they are one and the same because they both have to do with math and are cared for deeply, which makes them essentially the same. This has attracted the attention of many Nihilist philosophers who believe that the question point out the meaningless and sameness of humanity as a whole. Due to the unsolved answer to the question, it is often asked if one could “explain it again” to recall certain details of the question. It is possible that we may never know the answer to Alex Vs. Aleks.
“Do you know the answer to Alex vs. Aleks”?
“Nah. could you explain it again?”
Comparing the consequences to the benefits.
You get to decide the risk vs reward.
(A specific type dichotomy that the modern American media has trouble understanding): when an intelligent person, maybe a lawyer by trade, become so corrupt, that by genetic consequence their bone marrow becomes corrupt, and as a result they can no longer tell the difference between lies and truth even in their own speech
asking Hilary Clinton to explain the fact .vs. fiction dichotomy is like asking a goldfish why said goldfish breathes with gills underwater; its absolutely meaningless because the goldfish wouldn't be able to understand my question and Hilary Clinton wouldn't know how to stop lying.
A dichotomy that the modern American media has trouble understanding
How can Hilary Clinton the candidate, NOT Hilary Clinton the private citizen, understand what fact .vs. fiction is , if she doesn't understand that she is corrupt on a subconscious level?