Good defs already. Most people who preach anarchy don't even realize that anarchism is a sociopolitical philosophy - an extremely naive one, in the belief that without order, everyone will just get along.
Anarchism is a naive sociopolitical philosophy.
25๐ 26๐
Ok, for the last and final time, this is the ONE true definition of Anarchy.
There is no gouvernment and people work together with no ruling class to share the benifits of each other's labor and to live in a way that you see fit which is not supressed by any form of gouvernment. Anarchy is not Avril. It is not a trend or fad. It is a form of gouvernment that could work.
Anarchy = chaos is NOT true and is a COMPLETE misinterperetation.
Anarchy is a society where people work together without being told what to do. there would not be killing or chaos, because you can just throw out -or execute- those certain people. People would not band together to form another gouvernment like some poser/preps believe. If they tried that, the society would ignore them and it would be unsuccessful. All you posers out there that believe that Anarchy is chaos will be the first to be eliminated from society.
Anarchy does not mean "crimes," because how can there be "crimes" if there is no gouvernment to define what a "crime" is?!?!
42๐ 49๐
A political belief held by ultra-left wing college professors, students at UC-Berkley, and other people who think that they are "intellectuals", but in reality have no idea how human nature and basic economics work.
see wordPipe Dream/word
I love Anarchy! Everybody is equally in poverty!
31๐ 33๐
The idea that the perfect society would be a society without government. Contrary to popular belief it is not synonymous with chaos.
Despite many anarchists pleas to "give it a chance" what they fail to realize is that we already have, long before civilization as we know it was created we lived in could be best described as a state of anarchy. As we can see no, however, we have clearly developed away from such a society, as is natural. The only way to prevent such a natural shift to occur would be to create rules, which would not be anarchy.
Punk: Anarchy!!!!
Anarchist: Shut up.
Anarchist: Anarchy! It's natural and free!
Reasonable Person: Shut up.
18๐ 19๐
What uneducated white rednecks like to rant about in their trailer parks while grilling meat, oftentimes surrounded by Confederate flags and posters saying "The South Will Rise Again". What they lack in teeth, they make up for in Bud Lite, guns, racism, sexism, and homophobia - all tools they hope to use to propagate Rupublican and/or Conservative belief systems so they can make the world a giant Texas, thereby legalizing the act of fucking their sisters in hay stacks.
Anarchy: "Cletus, I told you to watch out for them there Hispanistadour Alien Swamp Beasts! We don't like none a'them border-hoppin' chimichurra eatin' motherfuckers comin' round these parts! We gotsta preserve the white race!"
"Well gosh darnit Bobby Joe, that may be the most racist shit I EVER heard! YEEEEEHAAAWWW! I completely agree with ya!"
5๐ 4๐
If used for a system, for a long time period it simply wouldn't work. Capitalism usualy thrives from anarchy. The person with the biggest gang and the biggest guns would rule over everyone else. Anarchy is pure freedom but the human race can't deal with pure freedom because of it's own selfishness, people would live in fear, people would get killed/robbed alot more frequently. Look at corperations today, one person makes billions while people in the third would earn next to nothing. Anarchy can be good as it is the result of a revolution which hopefully turns in socialism
ps vote socialist
Gang leader: I'm bored, want to rob a few people and kill them for fun with no punishment?
25๐ 28๐
1. Society's reset-button.
2. Term in the punk-movement, rendered meaningless due to overuse.
1. The next world war.
2. Look at the big red mark on the back of just about anyone with a mohawk. I mean, apart from native Americans.
19๐ 20๐