Random
Source Code
Random
this sentence is used at the start of bee movie
TV - "According to all laws of aviation..."
Humanoids Used In The Game ROBLOX ,
ROBLOXians are Humanoids Who Can Wear Accessories That most of the time costs ROBUX a (bullshit) Currency used in this Universe., The body of a ROBLOXian is made but not limited to : Plastic And an Exo-Skeleton that provides them with in-human resistance such as Sword stabbings, bullets, Explosions etc.
But sometimes an explosion or a hard hit can rip a limb out of the body. The Robloxian acknowledges this but if its not its right arm he still can use weapons etc.
Warriors on this word are called ''Bloxxers'' Who are known to destroy everything or kill anyone in sight. There are the ODers too. but this is for another text. Anyway, Once a limb is teared off the body the robloxian can no longer attach it back.
*Bloxxer Blows up Robloxian's arm*
Bloxxer : Oh, Sorry Your ok?
Robloxian: Well we are robloxian's so i guess..Its fine
ROBLOXian According to the my made-up Lore.
When a guy has a threesome with Palestinian chick and Israeli chick.
Guy 1: Charlie heard a rumour you got a peace accord.
Guy 2: Bullshit
Charlie: shows pics on phone
Both Guys: HOLY SHIT
According to me, this is what you say when you don't want anyone to hate you
Dream: According to YouTube statistics, only a small percentage of my viewers are ACTUALLY subscribed.
Fanbase: blah blah blah
Even according to players is a very old term from used in the 50's to describe any given team or single person the ability to win or lose when it comes to playing a game. It may also refer to a person in a group of friends who for whatever reason is unable to grasp the subject of the conversation. It was a polite way to say that someone was stupid.
The gang were all playing a game of cards when Billy walked up and asked who was winning. The gang replied that it was even according to players because "stupid Sam" was one of the players.
Someone whose only purpose in conversation is to argue/criticize about the nuances, technicalities and factualities of a statement rather than simply acknowledging the other person's general point and moving on. The said someone will likely come off as aloof, annoying, condescending and overly skeptical. Such sort of people are often SJWs or pedants and found predominantly on Reddit, Twitter, YouTube comments or some other online community.
Of course don't get me wrong, being the devil's advocate is vital for critical thinking and impartiality, but there are plenty of occasions when somebody's point or remark is better left off standing on its own. Sometimes a chill atmosphere has already been established and it seems rather unfitting to ruin it with an overly sober rebuttal. Sometimes you just wanna shoot the breeze without seriously getting into something, y'know?
EXAMPLE 1: This is the last time I'm posting in that community. I just wanted to share my heartfelt thoughts but the people there were all argue no accord.
EXAMPLE 2:
Me, shooting the breeze: Honestly, I think dreams reflect all of our unconscious desires that we normally wouldn't realize when we're awake, I'd recommend reading a bit on psychoanalysis, it's some interesting shit
Overly sober Individual: The subconscious isn't scientifically proven, FYI. We can only make deductions through empirical evidence such as neurological patterns within the brain.
Me: Ok dude.