Random
Source Code
Random
A statement of rejection of the "insantiy defense" for those who commit homicide with a gun.
One does not carry a weapon without intention of using it!
Bowling for Columbine; Aching for Aurora.
James Holmes' legal defense team may present a not-guilty by reasons of insanity, but while emotion triggers the finger; intention brings the gun, and he brought more than one gun!
The fucking jackass named Jacob Paddy.
When someone is in the hospital because they're fucking retarded they cut themself and they try to blame it on you, when all you've done is help.
"You my good hoe, are an over emotional self absorbed cunt bag. "
2👍 2👎
It is when someone is so overwhelmed with emotion, it resembles the crisis of the Italian volcanic eruption in 79 AD
In the story of Antigone, Creon was having an emotional pompeii when he realized he was a shitty king.
female weeb who likes girls because she's a trap
"this guy pulls an emote everytime..."
"don't you mean girl?"
When someone in a relationship, continually talks to, or hangs out with someone to get all of the things they are missing in their unfullfilling relationship. This may sometimes lead to sex but instead of adultery, should be considered bestiality.
After a weekend with her bf, she spends the next 5 days with her emotional support animal, to get her self-esteem built back up.
1. A person that is having an emotional affair with someone, who is in a relationship with someone else.
That guy is her Emotional Support Animal. He listens to her, takes her out, is romantic, all of the things she doesn't get in her own relationship.
No, you jackass. That's not how it works. What you're doing is what every idiot on the planet does when there's some sort or disagreement. It's the most common modern fallacy. It's not an official fallacy. It's ORIGINAL. UNIQUE. Which is what I do here. ORIGINAL refutations of morden misconceptions.
Hym "Let's call it 'Dismissal from emotion falacy.' Here's how it's works: You use my emotional state or project a negative emotional state (Anger, Jealousy, Fear) on to me for the purposes of dismissing a proposition or statement. It's fallacious (obviously) because my emotional state has has no baring on the truth of my proposition. 2+2=4 regardless of whether or not I'm angery while I tell you that 2+2=4. My emotional state is irrelevant. And by accusing me of 'Jealousy' you're doing the EXACT SAME THING leftist do when they accuse conservatives of being transphobes or homophobes. Protecting 'Fear' on to them for the purpose of dismissing their propositions. There you have it. 'Dismissal from emotion fallacy' that's the thing you're doing. Look for it. You'll see it all the time. People do it all the time."