A logical fallacy when netizen dismisses other netizen's opinion because s/he is/they are using their idol(s) photograph as an avatar/profile pictures
Example of Reductio ad Idolarum:
If you're using Justin Bieber/Billie Eilish/Boy band/Girl band/whatever the fuck your idol, your opinions are discarded
To cum into absurdity. Something that Is so absurd, you and the audience cum into absurdity.
I’m a simple man. I see Lana rhoades and I bagakio ad absurdum
Augmented reality, only augmented with ads
ad-mented reality in google street view is... well just weird...
Ad-Mented Reality, term coined first by Molly Wood, January 13th, 2009, on Buzz Out Loud Episode 1144
A fallacy (a part of ad hominem) when someone dismiss speaker's argument and attacking speaker's personality by using LGBTIQ+++ slur
A: (Finishing presentation) Any questions or opinions?
B: That's so gay <= B deliberately doing reductio ad homosexual by using LGBTIQ++ slur to attack A's personality and dismissing A's argument
This is the incorrect spelling of "mad lad".
Joe: he is an absolute "mad l ad"
Jimmy: Did you mean "mad lad"?
Joe: Yes, I did, sorry for my bad spelling, it won't happen again 😔🙏
Jimmy: I forgive you
Reductio ad Ursidae: A satirical rhetorical tactic used to invalidate men's actions or arguments by making constant and often absurd comparisons to bears. For example, This technique highlights the irrationality of these comparisons by suggesting that men's behavior is so lacking that even a bear, known for its raw destructiveness, would act more considerately. However, in reality, a bear would cause far more damage and chaos than a man could.
“A bear wouldn’t leave the toilet seat up”
“Don’t pull the bear card”
“Excuse me it’s Reductio ad ursidae to be correct”