Random
Source Code
Random
Talking about something in a group.
teacher: students, let's have a discussion about the chapter we learned.
Talking about something in a group.
teacher: students, let's have a discussion about the chapter we learned.
Hym "I'd love to have a discussion about how feline aids affects the stray-cat community."
Iam 😰 "But WHY though?"
Hym 🤷 ♂️ "Something to talk about..."
Iam "I guess but still... Who would even want to have that conversation?"
Hym "I donno but that's the problem with society nowadays."
Iam 🤨"That... No one wants to talk about feline aids?"
A double negative which -makes it by earth math standards- a positive verb.
Dis-; having a negative or reversing force | cuss; to swear at, curse.
I.e. double pun.
The discription of discuss should be self explanatory
A person entering a, usually controversial, discussion with the most surface-level, stereotype-based, and hyperbolic arguments possible. Their take then becomes the easy go-to meme response that spreads, resulting in a form of Flanderization for the discussion as a whole, cutting any nuance or complexity to the discourse and adding undeserved importance to it.
Some of the more prevalent examples of this are in discussions of Fermi's paradox, where the go to is, "Aliens don't talk to us because we're stupid," despite how much it's implying about the aliens in question. And arguments about America not using the metric system, with the reason often being, "Americans are too stupid and lazy to understand it," forcing a stereotype and ignoring any actual reasons the US hasn't switched over.
Since these arguments are often done for quick validation, they often have little to no research backing them either due to overconfidence of being right, or an unconscious fear of having to think complexly.
commenter 1: omfg why don't Americans just switch to metric already, why are they too dumb to do government.
commenter 2: You could leave and google how states' rights work, fucking discussion pollution.
Best Online discussion groups are located on websites and allow users to type in messages to communicate with one or more people.
Google, Yahoo!, and Facebook are the most popular software platforms for creating best online discussion groups. All will have comparable features, such as the ability to submit discussion topics, allow participants to respond and offer new questions, and send a mass email to all members. Some will offer document sharing and photo uploading, so think about where you want the group to go before choosing a software platform.
A bulletin board/forum system or a live chat system can be used to facilitate Best online discussion groups. The key difference between the two is that the former does not require all contributors to be present at the same time, whereas the latter must, as messages are transmitted instantly as they are typed and entered, using Java.
A chatroom for Pro Anorexia discussion, but the admin is non-existent and the mods are TERRIBLE! A wasteland of a place.
Hey! Have you seen Blah (mod) on Pro-Ana Support and Discussion Chatzy recently?
You mean the 40 year old pervert who preys on young, thin girls? Nope! He’s probably busy drinking. Only ED he has is erectile dysfunction.