Random
Source Code
Random
A person - usually a complete loser - who considers it of the utmost importance to make sure Wikipedia doesn't become good in any way shape or form. This is achieved through the practice of deleting photos, links, and entire paragraphs of text. In extreme cases entire articles are removed for the fulfillment of their vision of Encyclopedic purification. Other roles involve abusing other contributors, citing Copyright information as a basis for deletion of said contributor's work, questioning the beliefs of others and general wanker-like behaviour.
14:04, 27 May 2008 Wiki NAZI (Talk | contribs) (18,771 bytes) (Reception: REMOVED AGAIN. FOR. LACK. OF. SOURCE. We're not a soapbox for you, if you have a source that isn't your friends on an internet forum then add it.)
76👍 12👎
Academics who feel that anything found in the wikipedia is suspect because it wasn't written by a committe of fat-cat, overpaid, grant-hogging professors whose prusuit of pseudo science is endandering science funding everywhere.
Don: Don't cite the wikipedia in Dr. Patterson's class. He's such a wiki-snob that he will trash everything you have to say.
Ron: He's such a crappy teacher that the only way they can get anyone to sign up for his classes is to put "to be announced" on the instructor line of the schedule.
95👍 16👎
Randomly following Wikipedia links and reading articles, which ends up wasting a lot of time.
The longer the walk, the more unrelated the articles become.
I meant to read one article, but ended up on a wiki walk for the afternoon.
69👍 11👎
A member(s) of wikia.org or another wiki website who think that they are the only source of correct information on the entire website, they are most likely at mod or admin status, i.e. abusing their power. They will delete any and all contributions that aren't made by them or another mod/admin.
"Yo, check this wiki entry I made, *finds page deleted by wiki-nazi*, fucking wiki-nazis!
27👍 3👎
The game by which one chooses a random page on www.wikipedia.org and attempts to reach the article on pornography through as few clicks as possible. See also wikichain, wikisurfing
Hey Frank, I'm going to wiki to porn from "Guitar", bet I can get there in 9 or less.
39👍 6👎
Going to Wikipedia to look up a simple piece of information, and ending up spending several hours reading about things you didn't know existed.
Last night I went to Wikipedia to look up the history of the $2 bill, and ended up in a wiki-hole for 3 hours.
244👍 57👎
A loser with too much time on their hands spending that time at the wikipedia editing pages and making changes to fit their own personal philosophy and politics. The loser may have wikipedia administrator powers and the ability to both change a page and then protect it from other changes.
Over at the wikipedia one administrator is keeping any mention of Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears panty problems out of their wikipedia entries. It's one thing not to host the pics of the slits in question, but to keep out any mention? That's POV censorship and the act of a wiki nazi.
152👍 36👎