Random
Source Code
Random
Megan-logically challenged: n. A statement or opinion uttered by Megan, characterised by a high degree of inaccuracy and a tendency to defy logic and common sense. Often accompanied by a look of unwavering confidence, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Trying to explain basic valorant techniques to Megan can be a frustrating experience, given her Megan-logically challenged approach to the subject.
when one or more of the Hall family decides to start running their mouth in an attempt to insult, or win an arguement, but with incorrect, non-factual evidence and a combination of topics that aren't at all related.
There Joe goes with his "Hall Logic"... that dude never makes sense.
The concieved notion that you can accomplish anything, simply because it is required of you in that moment. Even if you have no background of doing this or there's been no setup for you being able to do this in the past.
Basically a lousy way to explain away a Deus Ex Machina.
As seen on the Flash:
The Flash somehow manages to get a train to vibrate at the same speed he is, so that the train goes through some rubble in the road.
Later:
Kid Flash: "How did you do that?"
Flash: "Because I had to."
Me, watching the show: That's some Flash train-logic right there!"
When somebody thinks they are helping but turns out worse..
Damn you tried to save me $14 but cost me 4 hours labor johnny logic.
A guy who is caring,loving,kind hearted and really thinks to provide quick and accurate solutions to problems.
Starboy Logical solved the question logically...
A major philosophical movement during the 20th century. Its wide influence became deeply rooted in today's scientific practice, as well as in contemporary philosophy. Logical positivists were philosophers, scientists and mathematicians with varying philosophical ideas, although they shared the so-called "scientific world-view", which states that society's choices and beliefs should be based on science, and that true science produces knowledge strictly inferred from empirical data (i.e. what "appears to the senses" in some way). The most well-known group of logical positivists is the Vienna Circle.
The movement became dominant in philosophy during half of the 20th century, before losing its widespread popularity later on. Nowadays, though, logical positivism is increasingly studied in a more neutral manner, like any influential doctrine in the history of philosophy.
You are welcome to agree or disagree with the different views endorsed by logical positivists. What you are not invited to is parroting baloney spread by trolls or knowitalls on the Internet. Like the fact that logical positivism refutes itself. It’s not a fact, it’s a viewpoint coming essentially from philosopher Hilary Putnam and that criticized a doctrine (verificationism) already debated among the logical positivists themselves. If you share that view, read him plus some logical positivist papers (if you’re already familiar with the jargon), then think about it and be proud of yourself.
The other day, I read a post from some random dude on the Internet. He enlightened me about how he refuted logical positivism by showing that it is itself meaningless. I'm amazed that dozens and dozens of well-trained philosophers/logicians during the 20th century never thought of that. Clearly, that guy is a f*****g genius.
When someone says bullshit with some reason that is actually kind of reasonable.
Most times, you can`t find anything wrong at their reason so you either laugh or tell them to shut up.
Politicians use this to think they`re doing something GOOD. The truth is, they`re throwing away your money at some crappy shit.
When you say some of this to a teacher while you are in trouble, she/he will punish you more.
Student: You shouldn`t tell my mom that I fought with Joe today.
Teacher: And why is that?
Student: If you tell her, she`ll feel bad, and you shouldn`t make someone feel bad.
Teacher: LOGICAL BULLSHIT!
Guy1: I know everything!
Guy2: Bullshit.
Guy1: If you don`t know something, you can`t explain it.
If there is something I can`t explain, I can explain it by saying "I can`t explain it", and that leads to a
contradiction.
So there is nothing I can`t explain, and there is nothing I don`t know.
Guy2: That is some serious logical bullshit.