As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a Khasm/Slipknott shitstarting/retarded post approaches 1.
Example of Khasm's Law
"Ok, you can sugar coat all you want, and fill in all the neccesary details you want to make your logic appear more concrete than when you wrote "I've watched 1000 episodes of Law and Order, and I know how to use Google/Wikipedia". All I was doing was responding to how stupid that comment was on it's own, I wasn't trying to "assume" I knew anything about your stupid court case. I was just making a point that saying that was stupid." -Khasm
your ex-wife's new husband and assumed step-father of your kids who you need to clear visitation with, because the ex-wife is too difficult to deal with.
My husband in-law is easier to deal with then that ex-wife bitch of mine.
n. The relationship formed between two males that have both had sexual intercourse with the same woman at different times.
Beth dated Tom last year, and now Beth is dating Tom's friend Steve. Steve and Tom are penis-in-laws.
A relational distinction. If you sleep with a girl, then your buddy sleeps with her. You are his peter-in-law. The relationship is one way. You would not be his peter-in-law unless you sleep with that girl again *after* him.
Sean Penn (Madonna's ex-husband) is the peter-in-law of Guy Ritchie (and let's face facts, a bunch of other people too!)
Usenet There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful.
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
To put it simply:
The epitome of all that is evil.
What's law school Kailyn?
Evil daddy!
That's right!
A building where you will spend three years of your life reading statutes, court cases, and legal commentary. You also will spend time arguing over politics, drinking beer, and playing poker. For the privilege of doing all this, you will pay a minimum of $30,000 per year (probably more in the Western or Northeastern U.S. states).
Law school typically serves as a training ground for politicians, real estate developers, and professional gamblers.