It logically follows

That if you in a war you should be able to expell the people who lost from the area? To where? All of the land is occupied by sovereign nations. You win a war so now you have the right to impose 2.1 million refugees on the countries around you? That's kind of conceptually adject to the argument Douglarse Murray's stupid ass made about why no one else wants to take the Palestinians. Would ANY country take in 2.1 million unvetted immigrants? Ever? For any reason? No question asked? "We don't want these people to live here anymore and God told us that we're cosmically entitled to a country where we're an ethnic majority so... Somebody else has to take them... Or we get to do whatever we want with them... And if they don't stop fighting we need get to kill them all..."

Hym "Maybe it logically follows in the absence of 3rd parties but they 'won a war' with the assistance of 3rd parties against a less advanced population and are sustained by 3rd parties indefinitely. There's international law and universal human rights to consider. Is they weren't beholden to 3rd parties and it happened in a vaccum it wouldn't be a matter of whether or not the had the right they just WOULD do whatever they wanted. But it wouldn't necessarily be a right that's been instantiated. I know your argument is not 'If you're sovereign over an area you can expel whoever you want' Can the U.S. just decide to expel all the black people? The crime rate is too high in inner cities. They're too violent. Their culture is incompatible so we have to get right of them. And if they ever attack white dominant cities we can just start bombing Chicago. Why do people think you're good at debating? OH! Right, retard-world. Hey, where's your wife? And I see you're on team 'Be unconditionally nice to retards and women or I get to do whatever I want to you' and I can still just murder some kids and kill myself bitch. Let it go. You don't give a shit about that retard."