Men's problems

What is even the logic behind that?

Hym "So, the solution to men's problems is... Men being better... SO... Men (collectively) have problems... But if the men were better they wouldn't have problems... because better men wouldn't be having those problems... So, what are these men's problems? And what constitutes better? Better, like, higher earning? Let's go back to the problems... According the redpillers, men's problems are... Having their lives destroyed by women through divorce, ok? So there's one... Do the better men have that problem? Who are the better men Konstantin? Is Elon one of them? You're on a team where you HAVE to say he's better than everyone Konstantin...

You have to say it... You gotta stroke that retarded cock or you're off the team... Yes he has that problem. Ok, next problem... They're not dating... Why are they not dating? According to the redpillers it's because when they ARE dating them it doesn't lead to sex... It leads to women getting free resources... Why does dating them not lead to sex? Because women are already having all the sex... The men they are fucking don't need to date them... So, the solution is be better. So, what do the dating guys do to be better? Like, there... What do the dating guys do to be better there? Now, I AM going somewhere with this, so stay with me... What other problems do men have? Inflation? Poor working conditions? Is being expendable a problem? So, I guess my point is: Men's problems aren't monolithic. Being better in some vague sense isn't a solution to ANY problem and this is evidenced my LITERALLY ANY INSTANCE of a 'better man' having a 'men's problems.' AND your tribe analogy (I don't think) is even biologically accurate. I once heard some scientists say (on some history channel documentary in relationship to re-populating a species) that you need A MINIMUM of 50 of each sex. So, it's inaccurate and incestuous. Just like you're religion. It's just retarded dawg. That's some retarded shit to say."