Random
Source Code
Random
Someone, female, who behaves in the oddest ways, with great harm to others, and for no reason, but just because they can, and, despite whatever they may profess, in the end care only about themselves.
Tatiana Estévez of Quora.com is a rare, strange cunt.
A less offensive-sounding version of "retard".
You're a redherring. You're missing development in the areas in which you are trying so hard to assume superiority.
People that suck bad. Extremely annoying and immoral, selfish, entitled, overdefensive, biased and suspicious people. Always take the worst and least sensible option, but the one that gives them the appearance of superiority and belonging. All their opinions and their capabilities in real life are worth dirt, but they play themselves up as the greatest thing since Ultra-Jesus. Basically keep the internet going and give it a appearance of the true "hub of society" and lfe, which is of course bullshit and exactly why they are so clueless and worthless.
Keep away from dirtle, don't ask for their opinion, don't rely on them, and don't be one.
The entity talking in certain Iced Earth songs like "Melancholy" (legendary btw.), and creeping into many other supposedly purely "metal" acts.
When Metal Jesus takes over metal you almost might not notice any change in your metal playlist.
The internet's self-conscious act of intellectual validity and authority. Unsurprisingly primarily self-centered and authoritarian instead of rational.
Some of the more objective or positive entries might at first make one assume that most people there are not just as insufferable as anywhere else and like any community on the internet, albeit maybe at the same time with an even more all-encompassing entitlement and smug self-satisfaction.
And assume that the triviality of most of the questions would be self-aware and not lost on most of the people.
Highly restrictive, not only in the artificial question and answer format, but also the ultra-strict length limitations and rampant auto-correct functions, Content Review and straightforward censorship.
Moderation is more concerned with keeping up appearances than with moral tasks, consistency and transparency. Sanctimonious, arrogant, prejudiced and irrational and with a cult-like devotion to their brand and policy taken literally and subjectively.
Actual psychopaths, either self-proclaimed in order to effectively show off or those whose practices are harboured there, are the hipsters of the place.
Your mom recently found quora and now thinks she is one of the coolest, most elite people around.
Quora is giving me the habit of thinking only in questions and and not on my own anymore, and making me think I should follow every response like scripture, simply because it's on Quora.
A new kind of respect or niceness on the internet that takes the place of real-world respect and niceness and that is mostly hypocritical, selfish and unable of respect and rationality.
It is what rather mediocre (or less than) and dim-witted people who look at the unfriendliness of most of the internet would choose as a way to be superior to that, meaning that it is basically just a way to be "superior on the internet" and another way to be unfriendly, small-minded and prejudiced.
Those people are incapable of formality and uncomplicated respect but instead have to pepper everything with sliminess, underhanded jabs, easily sparked personal grudges and "special rights". It is a confused, unqualified attempt at morality that is probably the biggest anti-morality.
Moderators that get paid and were picked mostly for a representational role often let it go to their head and are dirt-friendly.
Talking to dirt-friendly people is like talking to an animal, because they are so irrational yet full of themselves.