Random
Source Code
Random
When confronted by disagreeable or annoying people, simply snub them and don't give a shit.
"Bro if she's so annoying just use The Bendaj Technique on her."
"You're really gonna break my trust like that?" "Huh? Whatchu talking about?"
(v.) when you get your balls/nuts shoved into one's mouth and they "stash it for winter".
"I told her I wanted a blow job, but she decided to give me the squirrel technique."
The alexander technique is a technique that allows sexual partners to maintain the ability to walk after rough raw anal. They thrust in perfect sync at a perfect 65° angle maintain eye contact and match their breath. If posture or breathing ever fall out of sync you get hit with a ruler. At the end both parties thank each other for a the wonderful coitus and shove a stick up their respective asses.
Martin: Bob, did you try out the Alexander Technique last night? You have to. It’s the best!!!
Bob: sure did! I’ve never had better gait in my life after sex. Normally I have to sit on that donut pillow for a few days
A very rare technique used in handjobs, most women dont know. Usually handjobs arent great , but the doorknob makes it great. It's a method of using all 5 digits and twisting and screwing the head of the penis with lube of some sort. It looks like someone trying to open a doorknob with a greasy hand. Feels amazing.
I usually dont cum from a handjob but Billie used the doorknob technique and I blasted in a minute.
(Derek's Goon Technique) An individual by the name of Derek Pulls down his zipper and exposes they're penis in the middle of class and yells "Derek!" then pulls down his pants with no shame to fully reveal the size of it, usually in the presence of females.
Derek! Stop Using you're technique.. it's making the girls go CRAZY! (Derek's Goon Technique)
When you stick it in her soft and wiggle until it gets hard
“Bro me and girl tried the caterpillar technique last night”
A way to decide if a game reviewer actually takes time to play the game/plays the game they are reviewing. Here's an example:
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1: Hey, I found this new youtube channel called Jim Sterling, he is fucking amazing at reviewing games.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.