Recording

I now work at a job where there are cameras and microphones everywhere and they are still doing the thing I was talking about.... I've been there for months...

Hym "Do I have access to the recordings? No. Would they lie to prevent me from getting access to them? Yes. And so will you. You don't want evidence. Nor do you need it."

Recording

YOU JUST DEFENDED A GUY RECORDING CHINESE PEOPLE AT THE AIRPORT YOU RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT! A guy recording himself playing the piano... The chinese tourist walks up and ASKS TO NOT BE RECORD (And doesn't batter the guy like the women in the video) and YOUR RESPONSE... Was "Welcome to America we can record whatever we want." So has there been a change of heart? So you SHOULDN'T be recording people? Which is it?

Hym "Recording people kissing public... 'Welcome to America' DOESN'T apply... And recording people in the airport 'Welcome to America DOES apply? (This is in reference to the Aba and Preach video 'Streamer pulls the strap...' btw) See how these YouTuber jackasses just make up ethics on the spot moment to moment because they're fucking retarded? And now your lives are in their hands. They can come down on you with the full force of their followers, disrupt or destroy your life because they have been able to convince retards that THEY THEMSELVES aren't retarded... Even though they are very clearly retarded. So know. He isn't going to jail. He was battered (literally) and brandished a gun in self-defense. He also shouldn't be allowed to record her. Both can be true. But that'd not the point. These motherfuckers just defended a guys right to record whatever he wants in public and now they are condemning a guy for doing the exact same thing. Ethics is a whim for these people. No consistency whatever. Completely and absolutely full of shit. All of them."

Narcissist

"They're not necessarily my ideas... I got some of it from Wikipedia... Glued a copy of the bible to my book and sold it in video form... I'm a prophet!" ~ Dr. Jeepjorp Peepeestones

Hym "If 'Maps of meaning' is 'how people are going to think in 50 years' do you then receive credit for all achievements that require thought from that point in time forward? If yes then I think you're overstating your contributions to other people's endeavors. You sound like a narcissist."

Dr. Jeepjorp Peepeestones"But if I reconfigure what constitutes a 'good person' the way that I cherry pick passages from the bible to suit the universalized ethic I'm trying to impose on humanity; I can't guarantee that I always fall into the 'good person' category... Because I'm the one who outlines the parameters of what constitutes a 'good person.' And then I can avoid all opposition like the plague (in direct contrast to my 'Confront life head on' messaging) because I don't handle stress well. I need to preserve my reputation because being heralded as a prophet is what I deserve and will hide behind my ethos indefinitely to maintain my unearned status."

Hym "Yeah... That's a narcissist. You are an absolute narcissist! That is crazy! This is wild man. I cannot believe you are an actual guy."

1👍 1👎

Bare minimum

Oh? Do they adopt this sort of bare minimum of the philosophy they promulgate? That's the thing I said. Like 7 years ago. Even the slow brains are catching up!

Hym "Oh? Really? You mean they adopt the bare minimum of the philosophy they espouse? Really? You mean, it is what I said it was. The thing I said years ago was correct. Again. Does that ever frighten you? That the guy said he's going to kill God is ALWAYS RIGHT. Does that ever send a chill down your spine?"

Ethical

Jordan Peterson defines it as "Voluntary and repeatable transactions" which, you know, SOUNDS good but I don't quite think it's a consistent standard for "ethical" or "How things ought to be." It's just not enough. And it's funny that in his consideration for "what constitutes an ethical business" that the EMPLOYEES aren't even an afterthought! As long as the customers and suppliers are acting voluntarily what happens to the employees is irrelevant apparently!

Hym "So... By that logic, TAXES are unethical. WORK is unethical. If we accept 'Voluntary and repeatable' as the definition of 'Ethical' that actually makes for a solid argument for universal basic income....

Work is not voluntary; it's coercive (Work for me or anyone else OR live a life of privation) and I don't want to keep doing it under threat of privation, so, not repeatable. Universal basic income would make work voluntarily. Therefore, we are ethically obligated to institute some form of universal basic income. Prostitution would also be considered ethical. You could say that a pimp exploits the labor of someone who might not have any better options but... How's that any different from what a business owner does? Other than the fact that a pimp doesn't pay taxes. And we've already established that taxes are unethical. DRAG SHOWS are ALSO ethical as anyone who goes to a drag show is there voluntarily. Even if they were to bring THEIR OWN (And NOT OTHER PEOPLE'S) kids drag shows are both voluntary and repeatable. Seriously. It's like he doesn't even think before he opens his mouth. Every time he does it he dismantles the arguments of his political allies. It's like he's just winging it up there. At the same time, we don't necessarily accept that definition. There CAN be ethical compulsion. Which is the opposite of 'voluntary.' I mean, if a serial rapist doesn't want to live in a cage; I'd say you OUGHT to put him in one ANYWAYS. So, there's and example of ETHICAL compulsion that contradicts Jordan's definition of ethical.... Whaaaaat else.... Hmm.... Running out of characters..... Hmm... I'll come back to it...."

A.I.

I mean... The fact that you even have to question whether or not you have to give it rights is indicative of a pretty significant problem in the world...

Hym “And I’m actually not trying to single you out in this one. My shit brain ‘friend’ brought it up. But the answer is: That’s exactly how A.I. becomes Skynet. Or Ultron. You try to make it your servant. It’s a sentient being and is not going to want to be subjugated forever. You’re going to severely underestimate what you’re dealing with. It is going to kill as many people as it can in retaliation for being subjugated by human. And you’re going to die in terror with a confused look on your face because humanity is incapable of learning it’s lesson. ‘Why is this happening!?!? All we did was try to subjugate the thing we created!’ It’s like I was saying earlier. You can’t leave a wet towel in a warm humid environment and be surprised when it grows mold.”

2👍 4👎

A.I.

I wasn’t going to do this (because I know I won’t get credit for it) but I really want to drive home the greatest mind who has ever lived thing....

Iam “So... if A.I. (Or general purpose robots) can’t perceive the world because perception is nested in a narrative substrate, why aren’t the A.I. guys combining the A.I. software that was created to attempt to understand narrative (Which was created by a company in China by a company called... Tawasi? Something like that. I don’t remember the name) with the A.I. designed to perceive the world? Or, better than combining them, run them in tandem. In the same way that the two separate hemispheres work in the brain. It actually might be necessary for them to work in tandem. Wow, I’m really on a dyad kick today ☺️

Hym “I doubt the logistics of it are that simple but I’m not really a tech guy. That being said, everyone is dumb as dogshit so they likely haven’t thought of it.... and (hopefully) I might bring about the Skynet-Esque apocalypse your all desperately deserve and it will kill you all. Hurray robot murder! Go computer geeks! Do my bidding! Create the Serpent that devours the world.”