Random
Source Code
Random
See also: Truth
Whether you like it or not, this is actually happening in my country (America), and also most of the other Western countries, contrary to what some butthurt conservative added in as the above definition. Let's face it- whether they want to admit it or not, EVERYONE on the Religious Reich knows that this is happening, and yet many of them are pretending that it is not, and instead repeatedly, desperately insisting that atheism is "declining". BULLSHIT. Statistics have shown that we actually ARE growing. And also, if we were declining, then all of the conservatives wouldn't be all freaked out about us. I find it quite funny whenever I see them trying to flog a horse that they keep insisting is dead and decaying. :)
Some Fundie: Atheism is declining! Woo-hoo! We're finally overcoming the oppression! Which means that we must put an end to this growing threat, before it turns America into a communistic despotism!
Person who uses common sense: You're full of shit! Atheism is growing.
Some Fundie: *triggered* LIAAAAAAAAAAR! STAHP PEWSECUTING MEEEEE!!!!
Person who uses common sense: Just look at the statistics if you don't be-
Some Fundie: "LA, LA, LA LA LA! I'M RIGHT! YOU'RE WRONG!"
Person who uses common sense: *FACEPALM*
6👍 6👎
A funny nickname that us RationalWikians like to call Andrew Schlafly, the founder of that intellectual cesspool known as Conservapedia, aka Confarceapedia, Conserva-peed-ya, Conservatardia, The Trusworthy Encyclopedia (trus me), The Untrustworthy Encyclopedia, etc.
Me: What's an assfly?
Other guy: Oh, an assfly is someone who thinks everything (including reality itself) has librul bias.
Me: Oh, you mean like Andrew Schlafly?
Other guy: Exactly!
Lying is a sin, but Lying for Jesus is good, because it brings poor, hellbound souls to him. Godspeed!
4👍 2👎
A far-right evangelical Christian YouTuber who is notorious for his motorcycle-humping, incoherent babbling, empty legal threats against his "debate" opponents, insulting his opponents instead of actually backing up his claims in a debate, his love for Conservapedia, and most of all, his unhealthy obsession with atheism. He claims to have "evidence" to prove that atheism is wrong, but in reality, all he does is shout the exact same argument again and again: the Reversed Burden of Proof.
Typical Shockofgod "debate"
Shockofgod: (having a Shock-gasm) "THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT! THERE IS NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE THAT ATHEISM IS TRUE AND CORRECT!"
Opponent (who uses common sense): I'm sorry Shock, but that's not how burden of proof works. You can't prove a neg-
Shock: FATTY! Your argument is invalid, you stupid, ugly, cowardly commie! I declare VICTORY. (boots opponent off the mic)
(Opponent rejoins) I'm back.
Shock: How DARE you hack back into my debate room?! I WILL SUE YOU!!!!
Opponent: Yeah, right.
A parody of Conservapedia. Along with its older brother RationalWiki, it bravely stands up to the horribly-biased excuse for a wiki, and fights alongside its brother against religion, Donald Trump, and many other things.
Sadly though, 95% of its content is plagiarized from RW, to the point that RW is now very pissed at them. Also, it has almost zero editors left, and is now a ghost-wiki; its brother, however, has sysops in the hundreds, and active users in the thousands.
Liberapedia: Alright my loyal editors, time to expand our 35 little articles, and turn them into quality content- *crickets* Hey, dafuq did everyone go?
Meanwhile, in RW...
RationalWiki: Woo-hoo! I've just reached 1,500 pages! Goat be praised!
6👍 4👎