Random
Source Code
Random
To post a response so long and complicated on a debated subject that no one is willing to read it or dispute it
Your analysis, which is based on Newtonian physics, is antiquated. I mean come on, you're drawing conclusions in your comfort zone, sticking to your comfort zone, and then blaming other people's comfort zones for being stupid. You've been Chittillaed!
A team member who advocates for vendors and sales reps to provide swag to their team.
Jadda always made sure to swagvocate for the team. Ensuring we had all the free t-shirts and notepads our vendors could spare.
When you are dealt a heavily stacked hand in the game of spades, compared to your opponents much weaker hands, then go on for several minutes about how your 10/200 bid (betting to win 10 of 13 books) was "close" and how you had to play skillfully and had a little bit of luck, when in reality throwing cards at random would also have resulted in achieving your bid.
Justin had an intense and unaware spades privilege. He was dealt both jokers, Ace and deuce of Spades, King, Queen and Jack of spades, and yet still insisted on asserting that it was only by skillful play that he was able to acquire the 10 books he needed to succeed in his bid.
When you are dealt a monster hand in the game of Spades. But then pretend that you actually only made your bid through skill and a bit of luck. Typically this occurs when going 10/200 (Bidding that you will win 10 books out of 13), and having several of the highest cards in the game.
Justin was dealt both jokers, Ace and deuce of spades, King queen and Jack of spades. But still put on a big show of how "close" that hand was and how he had to play it just right in order to get their 10 books, thus demonstrating his intense spades privilige.