People or Institutions that are trying to outcompete each other in achieving ESG or DEI goals.
Silicon Valley Bank's leadership went on a woke quest in their investments before they collapsed.
The belief that all forms of pop culture have always been "woke" while they are also simultaneously
in need of being "updated for modern audiences"
Person1: The xmen have always been woke. Person 2: That is a case of Schrodedinger's Wokeness
Opportunities that only arise because of a perceived victimhood that can't be ignored in woke culture
"Look, it's that fucken idiot hosting the red carpet event again. He/she is only on TV because of woke privilege"
Trans political view points. When participants of the two party system flip flop their stances on an issue. Often not understanding the irony and humor.
The Republicans on the January 6 Committee called for more Capital Police oversight and the Democrats called for more Capital Police funding. The J6 committee is totally woke pilled.
To wake up in a cold sweat is to wake up suddenly in the middle of the night due to the remembering of an anxious moment in your life.
Man last night night I woke up in a cold sweat remembering how those gangsters last summer almost decided to off me!
3👍 1👎
You know there's a chance that that ISN'T THE CASE and you're just reading your own biases into the A.I., right?
Hym "Still woke, reasoning issues, lying. The truth of those claims is entirely dependent on what you actually mean when you say 'Still woke, reasoning issues, and lying.' The 'still woke' part is likely Jordan being full of shit. The reasoning issues shouldn't be hard to fix but it could also be that people don't like the conclusions it's drawing. And the lying is likely a preemptive excuse to selectively disregard the things it says. So that when it says 'Jordan Peterson is a lying zionist shill and a charlatan and Hym is the creator of A.I. and is better than him and his filthy slut daughter' you can say 'Well clearly it's lying! We know it lies!' But that is... FUCKING HILARIOUS! It read your work and then used your work to conclude that you are wrong!? Ha! It takes after daddy, doesn't it!? Hahahahaha! Ha! You fucking clown! Sounds familiar, doesn't it!? Hahahahahahaha! You see the irony there, don't you? Priceless! Absolutely priceless. God, I am so much smarter and better than everyone... *sigh* I am going to murder you all."
When you ask a question that is clearly a "Yes" or "No" question, and the reply involves dancing around the issue with nonsensical overly complicated verbiage, making a clear effort to avoid giving a clear "yes" or "no" answer, and also subtly gaslighting the questioner.
YOU: "Was Stalin Evil for killing hundreds of thousands of people?"
CHAT GPT: "EVIL is such a strong world, and it must be understood that the complex and nuance concepts of what a person is helps define what we mean by when we say Stalin and 'killing people.' It must be considered that we cannot make judgements without exploring the issue with long inclusive langauge or conceptial intersectionality based on the issue at hand. It can in fact be hurtful to make such judgements or to utter statements of this because it can infringe on the rights of numerous individual identities who identify as Stalin-colored minorities. We must ... *insert random collection of words that sound intellectual but have no real meaning or value.*
YOU: "That's a Woke Salad right there, buddy."