Random
Source Code
Random
Combination of ethics and Etiquettes.
The epitome of manners.
An oxymoron.
It is speaking about the state of bird photographers who will do anything to take a great photo of wildlife. The list of actions include:
1. Feeding of wild birds
2. Stepping on wild birds 'by accident' (OBVIOUSLY they just dont want others to get the same photo opportunity)
3. Recommend culling of bird's native predators
4. Pushing their way around with their massive lens to get a good position and refuse to move even if obstructing the path
5. Witholding information of bird locality, even if information would be vital for ornithologist conducting avian research
6. Breaking local rules and entering restricted areas, endangering lives of those around them
7. Handling of wild animals to prevent them from disturbing their subject
8. Unnecessary destruction of vegetation in wild areas to get clearer view of the bird
Find me an ethical birder in this day and age and I will bow to them.
An individual who performs activities, which the laws of the area they are committed in classifies as being illegal, in a manner that is more ethically acceptable than most other people who commit the same offense.
Some individuals who can be viewed as being ethical criminals are a storeowner from Oakland California who, on the night of February 15, 2021, fired a gun at two individuals that were attempting to rob a woman across the street from their store, robin hood, and Flores, an operator in Rainbow Six Siege who steals from wealthy crime lords in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Los Angeles, California and gives the money and resources they stole to the poor.
something that makes no sense. it may seem simple but it's not if you do something good, see that fruit or vegetable in your house you bought to be healthy it may seem like a simple choice but it was farmed by children or underpaid members of communist countries or slaves.
A: Ethics suck
B: why?
A: ex: a priest gets told a horrible secret but can't tell the police because they made an oath, but it seems wrong not to tell
moral principals that need understanding and challenging, not just blindly obeying.
what makes you acceptable in the eyes of the gods, if deemed actually absolutely moral (true ethicality).
good reasons to do things.
how you get dharma points, to enter The (Real) Good Place.
about ethics:
Doug: can one be truly ethical with rationalised empathy?
The paradigm that the number of senses outside of the world-interior can be counted if reduced to formas prime set-twin-prime set orthogonalities.
Effected by John Locke who concluded that a person's world-interior contained a SINGLE forma.
John Locke proved the existence of democracy analytically.
Immanuel Kant proved that human beings judge the world by a paradigm "sense-in-itself." John Locke came along and showed that the world-exterior contains an infinite number of senses-in-itself formas while the world-interior contains one forma. This result is unusual because it was in the 1900's that Alasdair MacIntyre finally separated public communication into the world-interior and the world exterior.
This communicado was ahead of its time as Kant reduced ethics to a counting-problem--not a problem of consideration.
(slang adjective) a substitute for fucking
Mom: No more Fortnite
Me: Who ethic understands?