Random
Source Code
Random
Noun. : What a woman gets when they have emotional baggage or haven’t had luck with relationships, so they just focus on hyper independence and their careers.
Damn shawty does nothing but talk about how she is independent or her job. I think she has career woman syndrome.
When your drawing was approved by every female in art class.
An American supermarket weekly magazine with a circulation of 1.6 million readers. Printed on paper generally associated with tabloid publications and priced accordingly
Woman's World was the company's first American release, and was aimed at a target audience of middle-class mothers. The magazine gained rapid popularity,
an American supermarket weekly magazine with a circulation of 1.6 million readers. Printed on paper generally associated with tabloid publications and priced accordingly, it concentrates on short articles about subjects such as weight loss, relationship advice and cooking, along with feature stories about women in the STEM fields and academia.
Woman's World was the company's first American release, and was aimed at a target audience of middle-class mothers.
A Northfields tramp who flashed herself all over the council estate with a druggy son named John.
There she goes, the one armed womble, that’s johns mam! Bird woman!
A man who constantly pursues a flirts with one (and only one) woman. Like a monogamous Don Juan.
Did you see that guy staring at his wife and ignoring the cheerleaders? What a one-womanizer!
A "direct correlation" would mean a correlation of 1. A correlation of 1 is as high as it gets. So I highly doubt the correlation between porn and WHATEVER is 1. A correlation of .7 is HIGH in terms of correlation (apparently). So high that Jordan Peterson cites the correlation when he's talking about the relationship between wealth and sexual selection success. But don't feel bad. You're not the only one using correlation wrong!
Hym "They need to retitle that video 'feminine woman DOESN'T DEBUNK FUCKING ANYTHING.' Oh shit... Have I been using correlation wrong? Oh shit! That means the correlation between fat cocks and sexual selection success can be HIGHER than .3! HOLY SHIT! I've google that word live 12 different times! How am I just now getting that!? Shit, it could even be higher than .7! What's more, there can be an inverse correlation between 2 things. You could have a correlation between fat cocks and reproductive success that it like 1 AND a correlation between baby dicks and reproductive success that is like -1. What do the studies say? Is there a study? What's the correlation between fat cock and success? It's high. I bet you 1 million dollars it's higher than .7! WE'RE BACK IN HERE! CRITICAL FAT-COCK THEORY! I look like an idiot for using it wrong but WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS is that I COULD BE MORE RIGHT THAN I THOUGHT I WAS! I could be MORE RIGHT THAN JORDAN!"