Random
Source Code
Random
A phrase used to describe the frustration of having one's ideas ignored or repeated by someone else who then takes the credit, particularly highlighting experiences of gender bias in professional settings
Person A: "We should implement a new marketing strategy for the summer."
Person B: "Hey everyone, I've got a great idea! Let's implement a new marketing strategy for the summer!"
Person A: "I just said that... I feel like a woman in a boardroom.
Definition 1: A meme within a meme
Definition 2: Similar to Woman ☕, it's used to describe gossip (the tea) that is cringe or nonsensical that is common or exclusive to women and their peers
guy 1 - "ayo, I got some woman 🍵 my girl just dropped"
guy 2 - "yo lemmie hear"
guy 1 - "her bestie recently keyed her ex's car cuz he cooked at home instead of taking her to a night out to eat and wanna to keep it lowkey and act all uwu to hide it"
guy 2 - "naw man, that don't fly here"
guy 1 - "hmph, women"
both guys - *drinking noises*
she takes me sexually any damn way she wants me
she womanize my ass
A Northfields tramp who flashed herself all over the council estate with a druggy son named John.
There she goes, the one armed womble, that’s johns mam! Bird woman!
A man who constantly pursues a flirts with one (and only one) woman. Like a monogamous Don Juan.
Did you see that guy staring at his wife and ignoring the cheerleaders? What a one-womanizer!
A "direct correlation" would mean a correlation of 1. A correlation of 1 is as high as it gets. So I highly doubt the correlation between porn and WHATEVER is 1. A correlation of .7 is HIGH in terms of correlation (apparently). So high that Jordan Peterson cites the correlation when he's talking about the relationship between wealth and sexual selection success. But don't feel bad. You're not the only one using correlation wrong!
Hym "They need to retitle that video 'feminine woman DOESN'T DEBUNK FUCKING ANYTHING.' Oh shit... Have I been using correlation wrong? Oh shit! That means the correlation between fat cocks and sexual selection success can be HIGHER than .3! HOLY SHIT! I've google that word live 12 different times! How am I just now getting that!? Shit, it could even be higher than .7! What's more, there can be an inverse correlation between 2 things. You could have a correlation between fat cocks and reproductive success that it like 1 AND a correlation between baby dicks and reproductive success that is like -1. What do the studies say? Is there a study? What's the correlation between fat cock and success? It's high. I bet you 1 million dollars it's higher than .7! WE'RE BACK IN HERE! CRITICAL FAT-COCK THEORY! I look like an idiot for using it wrong but WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS is that I COULD BE MORE RIGHT THAN I THOUGHT I WAS! I could be MORE RIGHT THAN JORDAN!"
Doesn't give head or anal or either.
Shes and Oxnard Woman like a pillow princess, doesn't give head or anal. You'd be lucky to get a hand job.