On 12th of may you can forcefully kidnap ur best friend legally and you can use a weapon if they say no. If they call the police all the police would do is help you kidnap that girl.
OMGGG ITS MAY 12TH NATIONAL FORCEFULLY KIDNAP UR BEST FRIEND LEGALLY I BETTER GO KIDNAP MY BEST FRIEND RIGHT AWAY!
Someone who is 18 y/o or older (the age of consent in many countries, hence making them "legal") and still has not lost their virginity. There could be several reasons for this:
1) A personal choice, like wanting your first time to be with someone you really love, instead of just hooking up, or wanting to avoid getting an STD. This is often looked upon as an excuse for reason three (see below) but this is not always the case, and there is not anything wrong with waiting until you are 100% comfortable.
2) Religious reasons, as many religions like Christianity and Islam forbid sex until you are married (see: abstinence) or forbid having sex at all, like in the case of Buddhist Monks (see: chastity). While this is not as upheld as it once was, diehard followers of their religion will still practice this.
3) Simply not being able to get laid. This could be because of poor appearance, lack social skills, hygiene problems, and/or just not putting in an honest effort. This is the most common reason for being a legal virgin. (see also: incel and inceldom).
(note: different from legal virginity, which is not having a criminal record)
Use case 1: I really wanted my first time to be with someone special, so I didn't lose my virginity until my 20s
Use case 2: I was brought up Orthodox, so I waited for marriage
Use case 3: I was weird and ugly in high school, so I didn't lose my virginity until college after I had a glow up
All are examples of legal virgins
Hunter wanted to be snow legalized outside of English class.
When someone pulls of some radd stunts in the court of law.
It's like mental gymnastics except that logic gets thrown out the window in favor of law and justice.
Commonly paired with the analogy of comparing a court room to a three ring circus.
Freelancer: I am concerned about the implications of my work on this project impacting the eligibility of the company to transfer the copyright of this software to the Free Software Foundation for solidification of the GPL license by virtue of my contributions making me a contributor to this project and a stakeholder in the copyright.
Boss: You are being employed by the company and acting on behalf of the company as you develop the software, so your contributions are actually the company contributing to itself, depriving you of any stakeholding. As for the separate git repo you are developing as a subproject, an independently functional subproject does not automatically become its own entity. This git repo separates the code solely to make the project easier to manage and does not constitute an intellectually independent work; instead, this subject and the larger project are together one piece of software. Moreover, the company has not authorized you to accept contributions from yourself, which prevents any possible contamination of the copyright.
Freelancer: Thank you for your insights. I am glad to hear your thorough evaluation and legal gymnastics of this project to develop remote-controlled vibrator software to pleasure beautiful hot sexy women everywhere anytime they want a hit of dopamine right in their wet lush pussy.
adjective:
1. A vote cast in the name of our supreme leader!
2. A vote made by a person who is dedicated to Keeping America Great!
Count the "legal vote"s
When mods of a Discord server troll people in a way that is technically not against the rules.
Example 1:
> "Jab just gave me the 'go to ultrakill land' role, now I can't talk except in the #ultrakill channel!"
> "It's legal mod abuse so you can't complain about it."
Example 2:
> "Why do muted users get locked out of the server but can talk in that one channel?"
> "It's so mods and other people can make fun of them, it's legal mod abuse."
Example 3:
> "my nick has been changed to 'short people fucker' what the hell"
"i can't change it either"
> "legal mod abuse moment"
Nonono I drew the parallel but that isn't the fundamental claim
Hym "It's that he has a level of Legal system determined mental incompetence that prevents him from truly consent. It's fucking ridiculous."