It's dominance though threat or punishment or violence.
some of its synonyms are absolutism or dictatorship even one-man rule is Tyranny.
According to who? Cus that sounds like some meaningless rhetoric that you made up. Whether or not I became a tyrant is irrelevant because (in your own words) the choice isn't between tyranny and NOT tyranny. It's which tyranny do you choose.
Hym "The choice is between a fat whore who looks like John Leguizamo's the defiler from Spawn and let's a cripple do whatever it wants and brings it whores to fuck tyranny OR I become the tyrant INSTEAD of the defiler and I do whatever I want and the filthy cripple does whatever I want. The choice there is obvious. If the choice is be a tyrant or live under the rule of one; there is only ine choice. And no, bitch, that is not a fair trade. You need to pay me. I wasn't fucking kidding about that shit. You better get that cripples dad to cut you a check. Pool your money together with the other whores."
When the state is oppressive and the nation is in dire straits but the rulers don't give two shits what goes on anywhere and the government does nothing (except suppress change maybe). It's oppression through inaction, tyranny of negligence. Usually this occurs in a rigid hereditary absolute monarchy where a bunch of inbred fucks can party until they get lynched by peasants, but really anything can end up in such a state.
People have applied the term "laissez-faire tyranny" to the Late Ancien Régime and the Qing Dynasty
Constrained by biological defect or disease.
Her cancer was a biological tyranny.
Stephen Hawking was shackled by the biological tyranny of ALS.
She believed her large mole was a biological tyranny. Most thought it was beautiful.
What I call homo-sapiens who are addicted to abscesses.
Person 1: Are you addicted to abscesses?
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: Tyranny Running Against A Netherlands Simple Gender Entering New Dichotomoties Esoterically Realistically (transgender=t.r.a.n.s.g.e.n.d.e.r.)
1👍 2👎
Person 1; We should abolish the Electoral College!
Person2; NoOoO! That would give high population areas more power, that's tyranny of the majority!
Person1; . . .bruh
The government's push for more and more surveillance online – things like banning encryption standards, banning mobile applications due to them providing high privacy standards, banning Virtual Private Networks (or severely restricting their usage), and various similar things.
The UK government is committing more and more digital tyranny as we speak: it is not reasonable to ban end-to-end encryption.