Random
Source Code
Random
Anybody who is a member of the Flaxton Book Club. They are really smart.
Hey look! there's Stanley, hes an intellectual juggernaught!!
A intellectually incompetent incel or a "III" is someone who is stupid as shit, and still has a v-card.
Intellectually incompetent incel
Intellectual Flatulence refers to when someone with a wealth of knowledge involuntarily and randomly spouts nerdy fart facts as a result of the intellectual overflow
Wow, that guy Craig really knows his stuff. He was having a large case of intellectual flatulence the other day when discussing the Dinosaurs tv show!
This kind of innocence is when someone, generally of a younger age or uneducated, is not aware of jokes and references of historical events, and/or is surprised when they find out about it.
This can also be used to define someone that jokes about tragic historical events and/or support these "ideologies" without really knowing what they are about.
py: yo sav check this sus shit out
*shows sav a roblox group that fetishises the a*yan race*
sav: i don't understand
laz: yoooo what the fuck
py: sav, do not lose your intellectual historical innocence
laz: for your own good
sav: uhh what
Intellectuals Deck provide a bunch of free features to smoothen your academic journey and to make sure that you get premium quality work within your budget.
Intellectuals Deck multitalented writers have studied from top-ranked universities of the world and possess vast experience in their respective subject areas. What's more, our hiring process is so competitive that only 3% of the candidates qualify to work with us as writers.
No such thing,
no really, there is no intellectual freedom... we have to many "bullies"
NERD: Hey, I have intellectual freed...
The poor boy might have had intellectual freedom but that didn't stop the terrorists from taking it away.
You knew I would have something to say about it right there didn't. That exact spot 😁 Now... I could make a jab and say "Well, maybe they're overestimating their intellectual capacity but I think that would be low hanging fruit. I think it's more interesting to say that the disparity is to great that I genuinely can't tell the difference between any of you.
Hym "You also have to consider (when talking about intellectual compatibility) the fact that half of the population doesn't believe in the I.Q. literature as a reliable metric for intellectual and refer to the fact that early I.Q. tests involved American history and pop-culture trivia while ingoring entirely the fact that THEY DON'T DO THAT NOW and it now consists in 3 sections (Word association, Logic, and Number sequencing). But I don't think number sequencing relates to general cognitive ability as it relates to a certain type of innate mathematical perception OR mathematical literacy (as it can be learned and once you know the equation that solves number sequence problems you can just solve the problems). Right? They're mostly proponents of multiple intelligences theory or rely on field expertise or education. But to use education as a metric for intelligence you have to presuppose that the people who have taken the course would have done better than the people who hadn't, had the latter people taken the course (Which you WOULD but only because my staggering brilliance would embarrass the professor and he would sabotage me out of spite). Expertise is meaningless if the conclusion drawn by way of your expertise is wrong. And multiple intelligences is just 'expertise' and 'education' and 'emotional intelligence (which isn't real)' and 'creativity' as, like, a plurality of ways in which a person can be considered 'intelligent.' So, there's that."