Random
Source Code
Random
If you were watching America's Talent and heard Simon Cowell say this and you were puzzled, this is something he says sometimes to screw with the performer/performers and scare them, and he is technically telling the truth because he did not simply like the performance, he LOVED it.
Simon Cowell: I didn't like it. I... LOVED it.
Conversational non-sequitur designed to kill an internet discussion stone dead. Always, ALWAYS, FUCKING ALWAYS DAMMIT to be spelt out as above, capitalised final word, full stop and all. Originated in Scotland.
Dave: Scotland Scotland Scotland
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Dave: ...
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: Nature is the existence of things, so far as it is determined according to universal laws. Should nature signify the existence of things in themselves, we could never know it either a priori or a posteriori. Not a priori, for how can we know what belongs to things in themselves, since this never can be done by the dissection of our concepts (in analytical judgments)? We do not want to know what is contained in our concept of a thing (for the concept describes what belongs to its logical being), but what is in the actuality of the thing superadded to our concept, and by what the thing itself is determined in its existence outside the concept. Our understanding, and the conditions on which alone it can connect the determinations of things in their existence, do not prescribe any rule to things themselves; these do not conform to our understanding, but it must conform itself to them; they must therefore be first given us in order to gather these determinations from them, wherefore they would not be known a priori.
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: ...
When someone asks you a question that you don't feel like or have the time to answer
Jess: What are the three houses of our government?
Erik: Do I look like Google?!
Engineering Calculus:
As the tangent to the curve approaches infinity:
Variable Constraints Include:
Time
Location
Romantic Implication
Humourous Viability
Sexual Implication
Newton's Law
Results can be extrapolated by isolating one variable.
Ex.
Girl: I don't like ditzes.
Boy: I don't like ditzes either.
Girl: I like cheese
Boy: Mee too.
Girl: I like you so much I might actually tell you
x = romantic implication
Ex 2:
Boy: I like funny sarcastic bobble heads
Girl: I'm a funny sarcastic bobble head
Boy: I like you so much I might actually tell you
Girl: Ew you're creepy.
x = humourous viability + sexual implications
Ex 3:
Girl: Hi stranger, pay attention to me.
Boy: You're pretty.
Girl: I like you so much I might actually tell you.
Boy: Your positive?
x= newton's law, time, location
What happens when you play among us with randoms. No matter what, it is always pink who says it.
how do i vent like...??? - Pink
The anti-label adopted by many true fence-sitters unwilling to take on the stigma and stereotypes of a label.
When asked about his sexual preferences, Rufus replied "I don't like to label myself."
A fat lie for i still love you 💔ðŸ˜
Boy:Do you still like me
Girl:I dont like you anymore
Boy:oh