when you delete something on your wall on facebook that another person posted it can also happen with deleting comments on facebook
*on your wall* haha u suck
(you delete the post)
*person who posted on your wall*"dude that guy was just pulling a nate"
When your friends ask if you want to hang out or get together and all you do is leave them on read and say you already plans every time
Erin: I asked the group chat if they wanted to hangout
Jack: I know I saw that Tom was pulling a Nate by leaving us on read after he said he was hanging out with his other “friends”
Nate does not have a father. He has two mothers. no father. just a couple mothers. no dad. his dad is non-existent when I bring up my dad, Nate gets depressed. sorry Nate, but you have no dad.
English teacher: where did everyone get their Hawaiian shirts for spirit week
ALMOST entire class- my dad gave it to me
Nate- *looks down at nike shirt crying*
Noah- Wearing same sweatshirt again. I like Nate's momS.
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of gore or child porn approaches.
person 1: *posts ronnie mcnutt's final moments*
person 2: "yep, nate's law"
Nated - Doodling on your shoes. (taken from Big Nate | 6 | In the zone)
John - Hey Nate! Look, I nated my shoes!
Nate - Nice shoes!
He has the best smile but he's got issues. He screws with your head because secretly down deep, he likes breaking up with people. But there's something interesting about him, about not knowing what he's going to do and what he's going to say. On the outside he seems like a stero-typical f-boy but he's got something different. He could be something amazing but not if he stays on the path hes on.
Nate/Nathan can keep lying to himself and everyone else but he can't lie to me.
(noun)
parameters and/or random noise added to a predictive model to enable the model to appear to include a wider variety of outcomes than the fundamental mechanism of the model actually includes
(verb)
to add spurious adjustable parameters and/or random noise to a predictive model to enable the model to appear to include a wider variety of outcomes than the fundamental mechanism of the model actually includes
to artificially inflate your estimate of a very unlikely event occurring to ~30% with no justification within your model, simply so you can cover your ass should the unlikely event occur, all while retaining the option to claim that you predicted, with better than 2/3rd probability, that the unlikely event would not occur.
“After realizing her model to predict economic growth didn’t include enough details, and was therefore predicting too narrow a range of possible outcomes, she nate-silver-thirty (ed) her model to get a more satisfactory appearing distribution of outcomes.”