Random
Source Code
Random
The decision faced when prompted with a low battery on a device such as a phone or ipod you wish to use later. Brought on by the fear that by going through the energy-consuming act of turning off the device you may actually use the last of the battery you are trying to conserve.
As Jenny needed her phone to call a cab later but had minimal battery left, she was faced with the Battery Conservation Paradox. Did she dare attempt to turn off her phone lest it die completely?
The phenology of the process as a self-state (metastatic).
Paradox-as-a-process implies that turbulence is a self-paradox. It is derived from Heidegger's phenon of self-caring.
Underpins the phenology of supermodernism.
Everything is possible, including the possibility of impossibility.
person1: don't ever give up! everything is possible after all!
person2: so is the possibility of impossibility. dont you know the Everything-and-Nothing Paradox?
The SHIT SANDWICH has different parts explained by HEIGHT of the SHIT SANDWICH PARTS and the name of the PARTS.
MAKING A SHIT SANDWICHES
HIGHEST BREAD OF CHOICE ROOF
HIGHER CEILING OF BREAD
SHIT FECES EXCREMENT POOP CRAP CENTER
LOWER. FLOOR
LOWEST UNDER FLOOR
Here is the SHIT SANDWICH PARADOX where you are sitting in a BUILDING you can't see the outside of the BREAD which is the HIGHEST , you can see the HIGHER part though but in a SHIT SANDWICH you can't see the HIGHER PART. Again where you are sitting in the BUILDING you can see the LOWER part as the FLOOR but in the SHIT SANDWICH you can't see the LOWER PART because the SHIT IS COVERING IT and the LOWEST part in the BUILDING you can't see UNDER THE FLOOR BUTT in a SHIT SANDWICH you can see the LOWEST PART which is OUTSIDE THE SHIT SANDWICH so therefore YOU CAN'T MAKE A SHIT SANDWICH IN ANY BUILDING but the only thing is , it TURDS OUT the CENTER IS ALL SHIT without any SANDWICH you can't make in any BUILDING therefore you need to call the PEDOPHILE and not employ any REJECTION but that is a PARADOX too.
Something that goes on forever.
When dogs chase their tail, they go in a circle. Circles don't end, which makes them have a dog paradox.
The misconception that some actions of simping can be interpreted as no simping. Some actions are simping regardless if you do them or not. The action of holding a door for the female gender is clearly related to simping. However, by you revoking the action, the females simp-radar might catch the act by thinking "wow, he does not want me to know he likes me, that's why he wont hold the door for me". This however, requires the encounter of an intelligent female, which is very unlikely.
You're really about to fuck up no simp september bro, you've been caught by the no simp paradox
I'm just a fucking toxic piece of shit that's all you have to say, like I should stop accusing just bc I am blatantly jealous and pressed about me having better clips, you mean all of your feeds are better than all my clips combined shit, not like that's a flex or anything since it's roblox you're just saying you literally do.
Paradox Virus told me that he has better feeds then all my clips combined. How does that work?