Random
Source Code
Random
Stands for Help/Harm Ratio. How many people do you help vs how many you harm.
Iam "It's kind of hard to track my H/H Ratio because of the fact that I'm not being acknowledged. And that's a little frustrating. People do come up to me from time to time and insinuate that they have a favorable opinion of me or my work. They're a little more subtle about it (due to the nature of my fame/infamy). I guess that's another thing you were right about. It's kind of neat."
Hym "Yes, yes. That's all well and good but people are taking our thing and using it for themselves."
Iam "Yeah... I just kind of want to see the effect of what I've done. It's hard to tell."
Someone who looks at your lips as you speak, and also spreads particles as they pass you.
Willow! Stop gazing at my lips! You're such a oberdictum-ratio decedendi!
Ahggg! Stop spreading particles! Polluter of space and such! Don't be a oberdictum-ratio decedendi!
The Greatest Football Manager team on Twitter.
Person 1: Have you heard about Ratio FC?
Person 2: Yeah, they are probably the greatest team known to mankind.
Pull-to-thirsty ratio. A word used to measure a guy's capability of getting girls
"Has Michael got a girlfriend yet?"
"Nah dude, his pt ratio is like 0!"
When your support role is doing more damage then its supposed to do compared its healing . The damage doesn't have to be higher then the healing but just high enough so that you notice. This behavior stems from the individual misunderstanding or lack of desire to play the role accordingly.
Person A: I'm not getting any healing!
Person B: Of course not bro, our support has 4k damage and only 200 heal.
Person A: He's got a fucking Zilber Ratio.
The amount of nuts busted in accordance with the numbers of nights spent with someone
My Nut-to-Night ratio (NNR) with Hanna is 4:1 this week
1👍 1👎
When a someone posts something thinking it’s based, when it is infact widely accepted, non-controversial, and has no one arguing in the comments.
High like low comment ratio, implies that the poster may possibly not be a human but instead is infact an automated bot account, or a human with NPC like tendencies which can fool people into presuming it’s a bot.
This usually requires highly tribalistic & partisan behavior. Meaning there may not be anything critical or based with that account’s other posts. This is specially true if that account has repeated occurrences.
There is a direct correlation between posting controversial matter and getting many comments.
Generic Dude: “Fuck Trump”
4,300 likes and 11 comments.
12th Reply: High Like, Low comment ratio
1👍 1👎