Random
Source Code

wikipedia it

In an argument, stating 'Wikipedia it' is the equivalent of giving someone a middle finger

Person 1: There are only 8 planets in the solar system.
Person 2: No, there are 9 planets.
Person 1: Wikipedia it!

by gundamboyzack June 21, 2007

8๐Ÿ‘ 5๐Ÿ‘Ž


wikipedia

Savior of high school students everywhere

Example? Pretty much every paper I've decided to hand in.

by AnWa February 27, 2005

8330๐Ÿ‘ 1152๐Ÿ‘Ž


Wikipediaing

The act of using Wikipedia

Friend: Whatcha doin' there buddy?
Me: Nothin' much, just wikipediaing!

by w10gooner August 3, 2008


Wikipedia

The best argument against democracy.

Wikipedia is full of edit wars, elitist admins, and non-peer reviewed information.

by Phil0 May 22, 2011

345๐Ÿ‘ 53๐Ÿ‘Ž


Wikipedia

A project to create the most accurate and complete free-content encyclopedia on the Internet. Written as a collaboration of users across the Internet. Basically, the UrbanDictionary.com version of an encyclopedia, without the witless comments.

An article on Wikipedia helped me write my Astronomy paper.

by Steven January 1, 2004

5948๐Ÿ‘ 1215๐Ÿ‘Ž


Wikipedia

A kind of quantum encyclopedia, where genuine data both exists and doesn't exist depending on the precise moment a person relies upon the encyclopedia's discordant fucking mob for information.

Wikipedia is the most useless source of information on the planet - things change every second.

by kalikitsune December 9, 2009

209๐Ÿ‘ 38๐Ÿ‘Ž


Wikipedia

Wikipedia has some serious problems. Wikipedia articles/entries that are about History or Politics are often unreliable, extremely biased, and incredibly one sided. There are many examples of Wikipedia articles totally contradicting each other and presenting the contradictions as fact. There also many examples of Wikipedia articles stating totally FALSE information with weak citations and evidence that readers think is factual.

Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, content can be changed by anyone for any reason, so each article will most likely be written by someone who has a passion for the topic and therefore a bias for or against it. Wikipedia administrators are shadowy figures that can have very strong biases, and they control what you see and read on Wikipedia, effectively altering public opinion to fit their narrative and beliefs. Take what you read on Wikipedia with a huge grain of salt.

You read that on Wikipedia? Ha! No wonder it's not true.

by YungGravyy May 13, 2019

319๐Ÿ‘ 62๐Ÿ‘Ž