Random
Source Code
Random
The OBJECTIVITY RIGHT AND GENDER EQUALIC way to say "mankind" (the meaning of "mankind" will still be same there but the sticker of the word will change)
And i don't give 1 damns(in a constructive-criticismic way) for those saying "why don't you just stick to "mankind"?
𝙒𝙃𝙔?
𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲:
1. the situation where word "mankind" is misunderstood are real (the reason of the old sticker of the word existed is in the time when the word was created is also the same time when women don't have rights(which makes the old version of the word responsible for a good chunk of sexism today in the long-term), the chance of rebranding the word to my version to a universal usage is basically close to zero).
2. Complaning about this definition basically means you are admitting to being a sexist. refer to reason 1
3. IT'S NOT THAT BIG OF A CHANGE BECAUSE THE REBRANDING OF THE WORD STILL FUNCTIONS THE SAME AS "mankind" IF EVERYONE AGREED TO IT.
4. Unlike other words(which has "man" or something related in the word somewhere by pure coincidence) like: "history", the "mankind" is intended for the whole humanity(and when most children think of the word "mankind" without context, it's just feels wrong...).
and finally...
5. I have good intentions and fatih behind this definition("definition" is not the right word here, i think it's more of a rebranding of an existing word) because i just want to make this world a little bit better for all...
𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴
𝘉𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘪 🥦
"Humankind can never change its mindset unless we rationally think and make a change for the better"
— someone
unrelated sidenote: have both quotes where the person who landed on the moon: "that's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" (the original for the historian) and my gender equalic version of the person who landed on the moon: "that's one small step for human, one giant leap for humankind" if you want :