Random
Source Code
Random
darwin, charles was a alcoholic man with suicide inclinations, a huge white barb and a amateur interest for the nature. Inspired by his 33th grade freemason grandfather, erasmus darwin, the absurd theories of malthus and other primitive inanities, he considered his theory of evolution, by natural selection, which is scientifically collapsed today. (But with a simple research, you can find some idiots who still do believe in darwinism: dawkins, stephen jay gould, douglas futuyma, ...
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
This "theory of evolution by natural selection" gave rise to doubts from the very first:
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
Darwin sell lemon to all his friends
Darwin is so stupid but really tall.
Darwined: Verb. To get owned so incredibly bad that your ceasing to exist contributes to the evolution of mankind.
Newcast: "In today's news, a local man in Florida was severely injured when he tried to have sex with a wood chipper."
Guy Watching TV: "Ha. Darwined, bitch."
The process by which, via natural selection, unfit specimens remove themselves from the gene pool. See Darwin Awards.
He lit up a match to check if the tank had gas in it. Darwinism ensued.
The most amazing and adoring guys you’ll ever meet. A loving and caring boyfriend, and protective. He’s so sweet nice caring amazing and just the plain out most amazing and perfect guy you’ll ever see to exist. If you ever meet one never let him go, he is so amazing and you’ll never want to let him go, and if you do, you’ll feel as if you’ve lost your entire lost. Never get rid of a Darwin, he’s the one who will change your life for the better and make your life light up by looking at him.
(Girl:)Is that Darwin?
(Girl 2:) omg yes it is he’s so fucking hot I just wanna fuck him until he dies
First used by Thomas Henry Huxley in a review of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species in the April 1860 issue of Westminster Review, it has since become a term used by creationists to poison the well when discussing (attempting to discredit) the theory of evolution. By adding the -ism, they imply a system of beliefs or an ideology, hypocritically equating Darwinism to any other crackpot idea.
Calling someone a "Darwinist" or "evolutionist" is about as ridiculous as calling someone who accepts the fact of gravity a "gravitationalist," or someone who believes the earth is spherical a "sphericist."
Darwinism is wrongly thought by many fundamentalists to be the "religion" of atheists. It's true that most atheists accept Darwin's theory, but that fact is irrelevant to their nonbelief in a deity. They simply see no reason to reject something that's obviously true (i.e., it doesn't contradict some other belief that they refuse to give up).
Darwinism isn't a belief system or an ideology. A person who accepts Darwin's theory (after 150+ years and mountains of evidence in its favor) is merely non-delusional.
The sweetest most wholesome bean you will ever meet. He is one of a kind and will always listen to you rant about your problems. If you are a smart person, you will never turn your back on a Darwin because his friendship is something people would jump up and down for. He is smart, caring, trustworthy, and loyal and usually weighs about 135 lbs.
HEY LOOK IT'S DARWIN, THE WHOLESOME BEAN!