Random
Source Code
Random
Are conditional and must (necessarily) be reciprocal.
Hym "Familial obligations are must be both conditional and reciprocal. If you're going to allow me to be unfairly maligned (say if your sister or mother turned on you after all the sex trafficking) and you're not going to make a vested effort in my advancement in the world; can I even really call you 'family?' So no. You're outside of the 'family box.' You can step back in whenever you want."
Only amateurs say this before a match.
Amateur "Good luck, have fun!"
Hym *long winded rant on how only fucking amateurs say that shit and how now we're going to lose because this guy is on our team and his bum ass is going to throw so hard it makes it impossible to win OR he's going to sabotage when things start to go south and the I piss and moan as so as he starts to do bad and I'm like 'Oh! See!? See!? Look! Fucking amateur! There he goes he finally decided to start stinky it up! There he goes!' And then we play and he's just feeding his brain out. I outplay the jungler or something and 5 minutes later he's killed the amateur 3 or 4 times and now he's ahead and there's no hope. And then we lose. Or I clutch late-game and I win, for everyone."
Hym "The difference between the recipe thing and Dr. Peepeestones' thing is that Sam doesn't selectively omit ingredients to prove the text agreeable to his ethical standards. And, in that respect, my criticisms of Dr. Jeepjorp are nearly identical to Bertrand Russell's criticisms of Socrates."
I just learned about a study that showed that toddlers show antagonism towards other toddlers who show anti-social traits are viewed more favorably. And before your a priori presupposition that the antagonist is in the moral right and you say "As they should." That's why I'm famous and an archetypal figure and the greatest writer of all time! Because YOU (Jordan) displayed anti-social personality traits! I've listed them several times. That's how I've curried their favor. That's all it takes. It doesn't matter if your innocent or guilty no one cares. But wait, (because I'm a genius) there's more! So, let's turn the hands of time forward. As a toddler, anti-social traits might be kicking and biting but AFTER they develop a personality then the traits people are going to be SOCIALLY REWARDED for antagonizing are: Low conscientiousness, low agreeableness, high openness, and maybe low agreeableness. That's why "Bullies feel perfectly justified" in antagonizing their victims. Because they are socially rewarded for it by the people who watch. I've deduced the cause and motivation for bullying. I'm a genius.
Dr JeepJorp "I don't know you! I'm not even asking you questions! I don't care!"
Hym "Exactly! But you HAVE referred to me on several occasions. You read a speech that I wrote and you've clearly instructed your followers to do yhe same. Say... What would they find if the got your phone JeepJorp?"
Hym "I mean the differences between us aren't small at all. On morality, at least, we couldn't be more diametrically opposed. Your's is akin to Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism. But I took that a step farther in saying that the idea that 'people have a responsibility to sacrifice for the greater good' isn't something that applies to YOU. It applies to the people to whom you are speaking. You're TEACHING so you don't have to DO. I think Ayn Rands criticism is correct and I think what you do it worse. You're not sacrificing yourself. You're not even willing to risk sacrificing your reputation to associate with certain people. MY morality, on the other hand, is closer to Peter Singer's conceptualization of morally. Meaning 1. If we have the power to stop something bad from happening without losing something of moral significance, then we must do it. 2. Hunger (I would extend this to all forms of privation), disease, and other forms of disability and death (not entirely on board with this one as it's situationally fine i.e. retard molesting whores) are very bad. Ect. (This breakdown of Peter Singer's proposition is from Jeffrey Kaplan's YouTube channel. Go watch the video. I still don't know about the name thing. Some of you clearly don't want to associate with me. Remember that? Remember when I said that? I was right to leave your name out wasn't I? Yeah...)"
That's the point though, isn't it? That she is internally a girl and has been since before she "put on the cape" so to say.
Hym "I mean... Doesn't the lack of difference demonstrate personality continuity rather than discontinuity? Wouldn't it be worse if "becoming a woman" changed her personality? "
Hym "It's not a hypothetical though. I am a Tyrannosaurus rex that turned into a man. Did you see the fossils? The transformation fossilized my bones."
Oh no! You have to do the thing I have to do! Oh no! For an indefinite about of time!? Awww... That sucks! But hey, look at it this way, at least the people doing it to YOU aren't retarded in comparison to YOU. Right? You're at the same level of intellect!
Hym "At least, your forced re-education is at the hands of people who are at your level, you know, intellectually... Because you're not all that intelligent? Hey, use your willingness to affirm values you don't actually believe in! Do that! Validate the axioms of the God you don't actually believe in! I mean... Not in the way YOU ALREADY ARE DOING THAT but like... The woke God... Validate that one now."