Random
Source Code
Random
Used to describe when a person tries to turn everything into a heated debate solely for the purpose of having something to argue about. This type of person will often continue after their anger is proven to be unwarranted, even if they don't actually understand what they're arguing over.
Guy 1: "Dude, why are bandaids so expensive, man?"
Guy 2: "Really? You really think we need to call every bandage a 'bandaid?' Those are adhesive strips. Band-Aid is a brand, first and foremost. Honestly if you hate it that much, you should buy some gauze. Like, honestly. It's not hard. Maybe you should think about that next time. If I got a cut, the last thing I'd do is ask for a 'bandaid'. Jesus."
Guy 1: "Holy crap, dude. That debate brain goes CRAZY... Remind me why I hang out with you again?"
Guy 2: "Probably because my opinions are always the right ones?"
Seeking shelter from the madness, Americans tuned in to watch Biden take on Trump, only to find themselves locked in the DeBates Motel, with no escape.
Overly obsessed with sex, egotistical fat man who sits alone in a room playing fortnite. He smells like Barney in a port a potty. Wears dumb turtle neck sweatshirts, egotistical pretty boy. Italian V. Glasses wearing nerd.
What are you wearing “Nick From Debate”?
A concensus that IDENTITIES as a debate.
Hym "Honey, on either side of the trans-debate you have the expectation (at some point) that parents are going to have to cede their parental authority to the state. If you conflate NOT giving a child gender-affirming care with ABUSE, you run the risk of conservative parents having their kids (potentially) taken away from them under the auspices of 'protecting kids from abuse.' And if you conflate gender-affirming care with abuse you run the risk of WOKE PARENTS having THEIR kids taken away from them under the auspices of 'protecting kids from abuse!' Nobody has to lose their kids. All we need to do is a little 'compartmentalization.' But the trans-debate isn't JUST about the kids. It also relates to your unwillingness to associate with people who don't affirm your values (and both of you do this) and your expectation for people to adhere to your religious morality (which is paralleled by the lefts expectation for everyone to adhere to their gender theory). As far as the penal system is concerned, you can't say that the Nikita Dragun going to a mens prison for some disorderly conduct and Demi Minor going to a female prison for stabbing someone 27 times isn't a miscarriage of justice. Sports? Probably should have SEX based sports teams rather than GENDER. See that? All you have to do is cede the term 'gender' to the ideologues. It isn't a huge deal. Health risks? Doctors need to be held accountable for failing to adequately inform people of the risks."
A teacher or lecturer who debates with an unresponsive audience as to whether or not they should take a break during the course of the lecture, thereby wasting all the time that should have been spent on the break, debating on whether or not to take the break in the first place.
A break debater would debate a break in this manner: " Should we take a break? (waits for audience response of which there is none).....Yes?.....No?......Take a break?..... Yes take a break?..... No? (waits)"
what asians do to commit suicide when their parents don't let them
i just joined public forum debate -- i want to kill myself
Very cool man. You got a pretty good score there. Now do one about the Peterson-Sphere.
Hym "Doug! DOUG! DOUGLAS MURRAY! Do another munk debate! I want to see you do one on whether or not you can trust the NON-MAINSTREAM media. Do one on the Peterson-Sphere! Can we trust them? Are they using the strategies of the Chinese communist party to gain a political advantage they aren't capable of gaining on the merits of their position? Why are they condemning Biden for cooperation with China when they are literally doing the thing that China does to Taiwan? Doug!? Where's Doug? Hey! Do one about whether or not we can trust the unelected non-mainstream media that is actively using their platform to engage in economic coercion and threatening to use it again in the future! Are they trustworthy Doug? Because they decry communism but... They are doing a communism.... Doug? I... I don't thing he can hear me.... DOUG!"