Random
Source Code
Random
A short; brief statement or argument that states the punishments required for breaking the heart of a best friend.
Girl: "I'm going out with insert Randy's friend"
Randy: Kinnikin Speech:"Break my best friend's heart, I'll break your f*cking jaw."
A term used when somebody is writing so badly that everybody is criticizing it.
random dude - "bruh this dude is writing a speech with a stick"
Its when you get drunk and it sounds like you haven't slept since you were 2...
Friend: D-DONN'T WORRY I GOOT THISS..
me: welp, talk about drunk speech... (walks away)
That should be the name of my biography!
Hym "So I do the Heresy and Hate Speech... And then I take a big fat shart right in shitty kid's faces... And then I create the AI... And then you breeder vermin just fucking stew in it... You just stew in my fucking shart fumes... Maybe give your kids face a rinse... But ACTUALLY... ACTUALLY that isn't what happened... What happened was a combination of 'nothing' and 'that guy didn't actually make AI thought it was just a global conspiracy to mock and gaslighting him because... Um... Because it's funny, right?' And then Suchir Balaji kills himself because he can't stand to live in the delusional nightmare you've all created and the Palestinians get ethnically cleansed because it's better to fight and lose than it is to allow hates speech to go unpunished except you're not an authority and your don't have the authority to punish anyone... You're just a fucking retard in comparison to the guy who created AI... Yes."
A lot of sophisticated sounding words covering a flawed, irrational framework.
a particular variety of "begging the question" in which the very things the author criticizes, he also uses to support his own position.
Derived from Social Psychologist/Philosopher John Haidt's attacking arguments against Sam Harris, over Harris' $10,000 challenge for someone to provide a written argument compelling enough to change Harris' mind re: the central premise in the book, "The Moral Landscape."
Exemplified in this article: www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/why-sam-harris-is-unlikely-to-change-his-mind10
Haidt writes early on:
" Nobody has yet found a way to “debias” people—to train people to look for evidence on the other side—once emotions or self-interest are activated."
"Saying human reason is a failure in battling emotions... except when it isn't... is pure Haidt-speech."
Yet later, provides a direct counter example:
"This is why science works so well. Scientists suffer from the confirmation bias like everybody else, but the genius of science as an institution is that it incentivizes scientists to disconfirm each others’ ideas, and it creates a community within which a reasoned consensus eventually emerges."
A required high school class were you seperate yourself from the rest of the class in a seperate computer room with your partner and hear things behind you (such as footsteps and bridgettes).
"How was speech class?"
"Ugh, I kept hearing things."
The native tongue of a group of villagers/ insiders.
Speech was made everyone’s basic human rights whether you like it or not.