Random
Source Code
Random
People that must always sit in the front of the class, either to pay attention or overachieve
That Kantian lad has a perfect 100 in this class quick sit next to him so we can cheat.
7👍 1👎
The theory that science is a subset of religion and predicts that religion will eventually subsume science.
Predicted the onset of postmodernism.
Kantian idealism predicts that religion will absorb science to create science-religion.
A dialectic in which, over the course of a non-Tarski space, an uncountable set of points called 'Tarski-interior points' yield to an infinite set of points entering the mind non-Tarski space or transfinite-space via supersymmetry.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
Kantianism is a theory of free will in-the-mind.
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
Kantianism is a theory that argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration always requires counting; but counting does not always require consideration...
Kantianism argues that free will exists because the uncountable set of points in the Tarski-interior count themselves.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...