conspiracyhypotheticus

In short: someone who keeps open the possibility that there is a conspiracy. However there is more to it: a professional conspiracyhypotheticus takes both the risks and the severeness of the consequences into account. This results in a simple analytic outcome in the form of four quadrants.

The most critical quadrant of these is the one that multiplies the risk of the hypothesis that there would be indeed a conspiracy going on times the true impact of the respective consequences for those people who will have to live with those consequences. This is especially the case if the consequences are not reversible and/or not viable for neutralization of their effects.

In case vaccines for viral & malicious biological agents that cause potentially more damage to the patients there is absolutely no moral ground for government agencies to make such vaccines mandatory including indirect mandates such as exclusion for the public transport system for the non-vaccinated ones. This abstract reasoning makes the importance of taking into account very unlikely arguments within a critical & professional discussion very well defined. Therefore any conspiracyhypotheticus of the reasonable and serieus type deserves not only respect, but als an appropriate amount of courtosy because the social & reputational risk of being ridiculed must be compensated.