Random
Source Code
Random
Old lady who orders cheeseburger with uhhh uhh onion rings. Stays longer than 1 hour at a restaurant with mucho blah blah. Drinks about 2 gallons of free water. Peppermint.
THE TRIGGER WOMAN IS HERE.
A cake woman is a modern term for an outdated concept. This particular one refers to an unmarried woman over the age of 25 being undesirable. It's the idea that if a woman's unmarried after 25, there must be something wrong with her and comes from the idea that Christmas cake is less desirable after Christmas. Both of these ideas are wrong.
Guy 1: Damn man, she's hot.
Guy 2: Dude, you can't date her. She's a cake woman. Ya know, over 25.
Guy 1: Well, thanks for telling me her age. Imma gonna go ask her out for drinks, and you need to update your attitude.
A little girl represented, considered and/or treated how one might otherwise have only treated a full grown woman.
At the child beauty pageant, she saw another magnificent baby woman.
A Northfields tramp who flashed herself all over the council estate with a druggy son named John.
There she goes, the one armed womble, that’s johns mam! Bird woman!
A man who constantly pursues a flirts with one (and only one) woman. Like a monogamous Don Juan.
Did you see that guy staring at his wife and ignoring the cheerleaders? What a one-womanizer!
A "direct correlation" would mean a correlation of 1. A correlation of 1 is as high as it gets. So I highly doubt the correlation between porn and WHATEVER is 1. A correlation of .7 is HIGH in terms of correlation (apparently). So high that Jordan Peterson cites the correlation when he's talking about the relationship between wealth and sexual selection success. But don't feel bad. You're not the only one using correlation wrong!
Hym "They need to retitle that video 'feminine woman DOESN'T DEBUNK FUCKING ANYTHING.' Oh shit... Have I been using correlation wrong? Oh shit! That means the correlation between fat cocks and sexual selection success can be HIGHER than .3! HOLY SHIT! I've google that word live 12 different times! How am I just now getting that!? Shit, it could even be higher than .7! What's more, there can be an inverse correlation between 2 things. You could have a correlation between fat cocks and reproductive success that it like 1 AND a correlation between baby dicks and reproductive success that is like -1. What do the studies say? Is there a study? What's the correlation between fat cock and success? It's high. I bet you 1 million dollars it's higher than .7! WE'RE BACK IN HERE! CRITICAL FAT-COCK THEORY! I look like an idiot for using it wrong but WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS is that I COULD BE MORE RIGHT THAN I THOUGHT I WAS! I could be MORE RIGHT THAN JORDAN!"